Subsector: Land Use
Job to Housing Balance
VMT Reduction Potential: 4
Cost: 1
ROI: 5
CVAG Relevancy: 5
Land Use Content: Urban, Suburban
Trip Type: Commute
Scale: Regional
Timing: Mid-term (3-10 years)
Implementors-Private: Developers (Employment), Developers (Residential)
Implementors-Public: Municipalities, Regional Agencies

Description

When the number of households matches the number of jobs within a region, the length of commute trips will be reduced. Shorter distances can also encourage mode shifts towards alternative modes of transportation. Matching housing to the job qualifications, and vice versa, can improve the efficacy of the measure.

Implementation Details

  • Update zoning codes in employment dense or household dense areas to support integration.
  • Encourage employment opportunities near affordable housing, and vice versa.
  • Prioritize projects (residential and employment) that improve jobs to housing balance.

Mitigation Potential

Improving the jobs to housing balance can reduce the distance needed to travel from home to work. Reduced distances can also decrease the reliance on Single Occupancy Vehicles and increase the likelihood of alternative modes of transportation. While there is not currently a CAPCOA quantification method, peer reviewed research proposes elasticities between VMT reduction and percent improvement of job to housing.

Linked Strategies

Equity Considerations

Increasing residential and employment density can raise equity concerns such as displacement, gentrification, and uneven distribution of benefits—particularly when low-income or historically marginalized communities bear the brunt of change while wealthier areas resist zoning reforms. Improving the housing balance does not guarantee the available jobs will match the qualifications of residents. Ensure that job availability matches the qualifications of nearby households, and vice versa.

Funding Sources

While it costs more to build more square footage and housing, increasing the density of a project generally yields a greater profit return. It costs municipality staff time to review projects with greater density and to update zoning codes. Grant resources from the state, such as the Regional Early Action Planning grants have funded zoning updates to allow for greater density and infill development. Other funding sources include the Community Development Block Grant (U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development), the Infill Infrastructure Grant Program (California Department of Housing and Community Development), the Multifamily Finance Super NOFA (California Department of Housing and Community Development), and the California Recycle Underutilized Sites Program (California Pollution Control Financing Authority).

Examples/Case Studies

California Housing and Community Development (HCD) Jobs-Housing Balance Incentive Grants

In 2001, HCD awarded applicants who produced residential permits in employment demand areas.