Subsector: Parking or Road Pricing/Management
Right Sizing Parking Supply
VMT Reduction Potential: 4
Cost: 1
ROI: 5
CVAG Relevancy: 3
Land Use Content: Urban, Suburban
Trip Type: Residential
Scale: Community
Timing: Short Term (1-3 years)
Implementors-Private: Developers (Employment), Developers (Residential)
Implementors-Public: Municipalities
References: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (2024), UCLA Lewis Center parking Reform Best Practices, California AB 2097 Implementation Guidance

Description

Updating zoning codes to reduce or eliminate minimum residential parking requirements, particularly near transit, discourages vehicle reliance, allows for denser development, and allows for more land that would otherwise be dedicated to parking to be provided to active transportation. Note that AB 2097 eliminates parking minimums for certain project types within ½ mile of a major transit stop.

Implementation Details

  • Create zoning overlays near CV Link and SunLine routes that eliminate minimum parking requirements for residential developments within high-frequency transit areas.
  • Introduce maximum parking allowances or tiered limits in mixed-use zones and Specific Plans to support active transportation and reduce vehicle dependence.
  • Align with statewide reforms such as Assembly Bill 2097 and apply reforms in locations such as mixed-use nodes.

Mitigation Potential

Limiting parking supply increases the time, cost, and effort to own a car, decreasing the convenience of driving as well as allows for land to be dedicated to other uses such as active transportation modes. This encourages alternative modes such as biking, walking, or transit, reducing VMT.

For more details, see CAPCOA, T-15. Limit Residential Parking Supply, pg. 122-125 and CALTRANS SB743 Program Mitigation Playbook, Parking, pg. 39-41 for VMT reduction quantification.

Linked Strategies

Equity Considerations

Encouraging reduced parking supply helps lower housing construction costs, which can benefit affordable housing developers. Prioritize implementation in high-transit areas to reduce car dependency among low-income households. Include community outreach to ensure understanding of trade-offs, especially in areas where car ownership is a necessity. Pair with mobility benefits (e.g., subsidized transit passes, shared mobility access) for tenants in under-resourced communities.

Funding Sources

Requires staff time to implement. Planning for alternative parking strategies can be funded through RCTC’s Measure A program, Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grants, and CMAQ. Proximity to transit and active transportation networks may impact eligibility to a broader range of funding programs.

Examples/Case Studies

City of San Jose, No Parking Minimums for new developments

The City of San Jose has eliminated minimum parking requirements for new developments. This change was unanimously approved by the San Jose City Council on December 6, 2022, and took effect on April 10, 2023. This marks the first significant update to parking rules since 1965 and is designed to encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation like BART and VTA, while also making housing development easier and less costly

City of Alameda, Citywide Parking Mandate Removal

This ordinance, passed in November 2021, represents a major policy shift aimed at promoting more sustainable urban development. The new regulations comprehensively update off-street parking and loading space requirements, aligning with broader zoning code sections and the city’s planning objectives. By removing parking mandates, Alameda aims to encourage alternative transportation modes, reduce the reliance on car ownership, and stimulate more efficient land use.